A reversible silicone ring worn by male partners as an adjunct to optimise the durability of benzathine penicillin G (BPG) treatment in women with syphilis: a feasibility, acceptability, safety and mechanistic pilot in Ugandan men
A fully designed feasibility, acceptability, safety and mechanistic pilot proposed to assess 8-week wear of a reversible silicone ring in men attending VMMC services in Uganda — ready to execute pending funding, with a top-tier Ugandan investigator team assembled and the study site confirmed at Rakai.
Price & Liu — Circumcision shifts the penile microbiome
Male circumcision produces a reproducible, sustained shift from anaerobic-dominant to aerobic-dominant microbiota at the subpreputial site — mirroring the CST shift ADJUNCT-SYPH proposes to achieve non-surgically.
Cohort — Rakai
Galiwango 2022 — Penile anaerobe abundance characterised at Rakai
The anaerobe-rich subpreputial and coronal-sulcus community — including taxa such as Parvimonas, Dialister and Sneathia — was quantified in uncircumcised Ugandan men, with anaerobe abundance falling sharply after circumcision, at the Rakai Health Sciences Program — the same site as ADJUNCT-SYPH.
Prospective cohort — female protection
Pintye 2014 / Grund 2017 — Male circumcision protects women against syphilis
A prospective study in HIV-serodiscordant African couples found male circumcision associated with a 59% reduction in incident syphilis among female partners (aHR 0.41, 95% CI 0.25–0.69); a subsequent systematic review rated the evidence that male circumcision protects women against syphilis as highly consistent — establishing that modifying the male genital environment confers measurable downstream female protection.
Proof-of-concept RCT
Vodstrcil / NEJM 2025 — StepUp proof-of-concept
The StepUp trial (NEJM 2025) demonstrated that male partner treatment to modify genital microbiota reduces female BV recurrence from 63% to 35% at 12 weeks — validating the dyadic transmission hypothesis that ADJUNCT-SYPH will extend to syphilis.
The intervention
A reversible silicone ring to modify the subpreputial niche
Physical mechanism
The ring is worn continuously and everts the foreskin, eliminating the closed subpreputial space and increasing local aeration. This removes the warm, moist, oxygen-depleted microenvironment that supports the BASIC consortium of anaerobic taxa.
Biological hypothesis (8 weeks)
Increased local O₂ tension over 8 weeks is hypothesised to progressively suppress anaerobic taxa (BASIC consortium) and shift the subpreputial community state type (CST) toward the aerobic, diverse profile observed after surgical circumcision. This shift is the primary measurable endpoint of the pilot.
Regulatory status
●
Currently placed on the EU market as a hygiene product under the General Product Safety Regulation (GPSR) by Circunaro SL.
●
Previously CE-marked as a Class I medical device under Directive 93/42/EEC.
Regulatory classification for use in this pilot study will be confirmed with the Ugandan National Drug Authority (NDA) and the Ethics Committee prior to first participant in.
Participant recruitment has not yet commenced. We are currently building the investigator consortium. The study will open to recruitment only after funding confirmation and ethics committee approval.
≥1.5 log₁₀ reduction in BASIC consortium in Arm A vs. Arm B at W8, with ≥70% retention and acceptable safety profile → proceed to full dyadic RCT design and Wellcome programme grant application.
REVISE
0.5–1.5 log₁₀ reduction, or retention 50–70% → protocol review with DMC and funder; potential protocol amendment before escalation.
NO-GO
<0.5 log₁₀ reduction, or retention <50%, or unacceptable safety events → halt programme, publish null results, reassess device modification.
24-month programme
Programme timeline
M4First participant in
M825% recruited
M1480% recruitedDMC interim review
M18Recruitment complete
M24Analysis completeDyadic RCT protocol submitted
People & institutions
Team and partners
Investigators who have developed the proposal
The following Ugandan investigators have co-developed this proposal. All are researchers at RHSP and/or AMBSO with deep expertise in Rakai-based male-circumcision and STI research. Roles shown are as agreed in the current draft and will be formally confirmed upon funding and ethics approval.
Dr Godfrey KigoziProposed Principal Investigator · AMBSO / RHSP
Senior research scientist who has led medical male-circumcision trials and outcome studies in Rakai, Uganda (e.g. Kigozi et al., PLoS ONE 2014; BJU Int 2013).
Dr Ronald Moses GaliwangoProposed microbiome / laboratory lead · RHSP
Researcher at the Rakai Health Sciences Program whose work characterised the penile coronal-sulcus microbiome and anaerobe abundance before and after circumcision in Ugandan men (Galiwango et al., Microbiome 2022).
Dr Gertrude NakigoziInvestigator · RHSP
Research scientist at the Rakai Health Sciences Program, Uganda.
Dr Fred NalugodaInvestigator · RHSP
Epidemiologist at the Rakai Health Sciences Program, Uganda, with extensive experience in population-based cohort research.
Dr Stephen MugambaInvestigator · AMBSO / RHSP
Researcher at AMBSO and the Rakai Health Sciences Program, Uganda.
Partner institutions
AMBSOAfrica Medical and Behavioural Sciences OrganizationProposed host institution
RHSPRakai Health Sciences ProgramProposed co-applicant — microbiome lead
Makerere UniversityCollege of Health Sciences, KampalaProposed academic co-sponsor
Circunaro SLMadrid, SpainDevice manufacturer — no applicant role
Bibliography
Key references
WHO (2022). Global progress report on HIV, viral hepatitis and sexually transmitted infections, 2021. World Health Organization, Geneva.
Korenromp EL, et al. (2019). Global burden of maternal and congenital syphilis and associated adverse birth outcomes — estimates for 2016 and progress since 2012. PLOS ONE. 14(2):e0211720.
Kizito D, et al. (2008). Partner notification for control of HIV and sexually transmitted infections in Uganda. Sexually Transmitted Infections. 84(4):331–335.
Nakku-Joloba E, et al. (2019). Perspectives on male partner notification and treatment for syphilis among antenatal women and their partners in Kampala and Wakiso districts, Uganda. BMC Infectious Diseases. 19(1):124. doi:10.1186/s12879-019-3695-y
Parkes-Ratanshi R, et al. (2020). Low male partner attendance after syphilis screening in pregnant women leads to worse birth outcomes: the Syphilis Treatment of Partners (STOP) randomised control trial. Sexual Health. 17(3):214–222. doi:10.1071/SH19092
Price LB, et al. (2010). The effects of circumcision on the penis microbiome. PLOS ONE. 5(1):e8422.
Galiwango RM, et al. (2022). Immune milieu and microbiome of the distal urethra in Ugandan men: impact of penile circumcision and implications for HIV susceptibility. Microbiome. 10(1):7. doi:10.1186/s40168-021-01185-9
Pintye J, et al. (2014). Association between male circumcision and incidence of syphilis in men and women: a prospective study in HIV-1 serodiscordant heterosexual African couples. Lancet Global Health. 2(11):e664–671. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70315-8
Grund JM, et al. (2017). Association between male circumcision and women's biomedical health outcomes: a systematic review. Lancet Global Health. 5(11):e1113–e1122. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30369-8
Vodstrcil LA, et al. (2025). Male-partner treatment to prevent recurrence of bacterial vaginosis. New England Journal of Medicine. 392(10):947–957. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2405404
Parallel workstream
Preparing the definitive dyadic RCT — in parallel with this pilot
The 24 months of the mechanistic pilot are the same 24 months during which the dyadic trial protocol, counselling curriculum, IPV-safeguarding pathway, and PPIE infrastructure must be co-designed. We are actively seeking co-investigators, Ugandan partner organisations, and co-funders for this preparation phase.
ADJUNCT-SYPH has been designed as a strong candidate study for an EDCTP3 consortium application. The Ugandan investigator team and study site are in place. We are now seeking European research partners — institutions with EDCTP3 experience and interest in African STI or reproductive health research — to help us prepare and submit a complete consortium proposal. If your institution could contribute to this application, we welcome a conversation.
Get involved
Interested in this programme?
We welcome enquiries from potential collaborators, funders, and scientific reviewers. A full protocol summary is available for institutional review on request.