Study in preparation — not yet funded

ADJUNCT-SYPH

Optimising benzathine penicillin G for dyadic syphilis control when the male partner does not reach the clinic: a pilot randomised study of a reversible biophysical adjunct delivered as part of an integrated partner-engagement package, in Rakai, Uganda

A mechanistic pilot to determine whether the subpreputial silicone ring shifts the male genital microbiome toward a post-circumcision-like state — enabling a definitive dyadic trial for syphilis control in high-burden settings.

  • Uganda
  • Rakai
  • 24 months
  • ~120 men
  • Mechanistic pilot
The gap

Syphilis control has structural failures that existing tools have not resolved

8 M

New infections per year persist despite BPG availability

8 million new syphilis infections annually worldwide, despite benzathine penicillin G (BPG) being efficacious, affordable, and widely recommended.

WHO 2022 · Korenromp 2019
1.1–18.3%

Male partners who reach treatment in partner notification programmes

Standard partner notification achieves male partner treatment in only 1.1–18.3% of index cases, leaving the reinfection source largely untreated.

Kizito 2008 · Nakku-Joloba 2019
700 K

Congenital syphilis cases each year globally

700,000 annual congenital syphilis cases — representing preventable neonatal morbidity and mortality — persist because maternal infection recurs while male reservoirs remain untreated.

Korenromp 2019 · WHO 2022
The hypothesis

A causal pathway from subpreputial niche to syphilis susceptibility

Pilot scope
1
Subpreputial anaerobic niche

Uncircumcised men — BASIC consortium, CST 4–7

Pilot scope
2
Transfer at intercourse

Parvimonas · Dialister · Sneathia sanguinegens

Future dyadic RCT
3
Vaginal dysbiosis / BV

CST 4–7 in female partner

Future dyadic RCT
4
↑ Mucosal susceptibility to T. pallidum

Impaired epithelial barrier → enhanced pathogen entry

Supporting evidence

Four pillars of mechanistic evidence

Longitudinal RCT data

Price & Liu — Circumcision shifts the penile microbiome

Male circumcision produces a reproducible, sustained shift from anaerobic-dominant to aerobic-dominant microbiota at the subpreputial site — mirroring the CST shift ADJUNCT-SYPH proposes to achieve non-surgically.

Cohort — Rakai

Galiwango 2019 — BASIC consortium characterised at Rakai

The BASIC consortium (Parvimonas, Dialister, Sneathia sanguinegens) was defined and characterised in uncircumcised Ugandan men at the Rakai Health Sciences Program — the same site as ADJUNCT-SYPH.

RCT — female protection

Pintye 2014 / Grund 2017 — Lower STI acquisition in female partners

Data from the Rakai circumcision trials, and a later systematic review, suggest a lower acquisition of some STIs among female partners of circumcised men. These are secondary analyses; the size of the effect depends on the infection and the study.

RCT (antibiotics)

Vodstrcil / NEJM 2025 — StepUp: partner treatment and BV

In the StepUp trial (NEJM 2025), treating the male partner with antibiotics reduced female BV recurrence at 12 weeks from 63% to 35%. This supports the idea that male partners matter for female reproductive tract infections. It does not show that a non-antibiotic approach works, and it did not study syphilis; ADJUNCT-SYPH tests a different intervention for a different infection.

The intervention

A reversible silicone ring to modify the subpreputial niche

Physical mechanism

The ring is worn continuously and everts the foreskin, eliminating the closed subpreputial space and increasing local aeration. This removes the warm, moist, oxygen-depleted microenvironment that supports the BASIC consortium of anaerobic taxa.

Biological hypothesis (8 weeks)

Increased local O₂ tension over 8 weeks is hypothesised to progressively suppress anaerobic taxa (BASIC consortium) and shift the subpreputial community state type (CST) toward the aerobic, diverse profile observed after surgical circumcision. This shift is the primary measurable endpoint of the pilot.

Regulatory status

Currently placed on the EU market as a hygiene product under the General Product Safety Regulation (GPSR) by Circunaro SL.

Previously CE-marked as a Class I medical device under Directive 93/42/EEC.

Regulatory classification for use in this pilot study will be confirmed with the Ugandan National Drug Authority (NDA) and the Ethics Committee prior to first participant in.

Protocol

Study design

Two-arm parallel-group mechanistic pilot 1:1 randomisation Open-label
Arm A — Ring
  1. Ring worn continuously for 8 weeks
  2. Subpreputial swabs at W0 · W4 · W8
  3. VMMC at W8
  4. Post-VMMC anchor swab at W+4
Arm B — Control (VMMC waitlist)
  1. Standard VMMC waitlist (no ring)
  2. Subpreputial swabs at W0 · W4 · W8
  3. VMMC at W8
  4. Post-VMMC anchor swab at W+4
Primary endpoint

Δ log₁₀ BASIC consortium abundance (qPCR copies/swab), W0→W8, between-arm difference

Stop/Go decision criteria

  • GO

    ≥1.5 log₁₀ reduction in BASIC consortium in Arm A vs. Arm B at W8, with ≥70% retention and acceptable safety profile → proceed to full dyadic RCT design and Wellcome programme grant application.

  • REVISE

    0.5–1.5 log₁₀ reduction, or retention 50–70% → protocol review with DMC and funder; potential protocol amendment before escalation.

  • NO-GO

    <0.5 log₁₀ reduction, or retention <50%, or unacceptable safety events → halt programme, publish null results, reassess device modification.

24-month programme

Programme timeline

M4 First participant in
M8 25% recruited
M14 80% recruited DMC interim review
M18 Recruitment complete
M24 Analysis complete Dyadic RCT protocol submitted
People & institutions

Team and partners

Named applicants

Dr Godfrey Kigozi Principal Investigator · AMBSO

Senior research scientist at the Africa Medical and Behavioural Sciences Organization (AMBSO), Rakai. Lead investigator for the ADJUNCT-SYPH pilot.

Dr Ronald Galiwango Lead Co-applicant · RHSP / Makerere University

Medical Officer / Laboratory Director, Rakai Health Sciences Program, Uganda. Characterised the BASIC consortium in the study population (Galiwango 2019).

Partner institutions

AMBSO Africa Medical and Behavioural Sciences Organization Host institution — PI
RHSP Rakai Health Sciences Program Co-applicant institution — microbiome lead
Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala Academic co-sponsor
Circunaro SL Madrid, Spain Device manufacturer — no applicant role
Bibliography

Key references

  1. WHO (2022). Global progress report on HIV, viral hepatitis and sexually transmitted infections, 2021. World Health Organization, Geneva.
  2. Korenromp EL, et al. (2019). Global burden of maternal and congenital syphilis and associated adverse birth outcomes — estimates for 2016 and progress since 2012. PLOS ONE. 14(2):e0211720.
  3. Kizito D, et al. (2008). Partner notification for control of HIV and sexually transmitted infections in Uganda. Sexually Transmitted Infections. 84(4):331–335.
  4. Nakku-Joloba E, et al. (2019). Beyond HIV: clinical outcomes and costs of syphilis treatment. (citation under verification)
  5. Price LB, et al. (2010). The effects of circumcision on the penis microbiome. PLOS ONE. 5(1):e8422.
  6. Galiwango RM, et al. (2019). Characterisation of the subpreputial microbiome and BASIC consortium in Rakai, Uganda. (citation under verification)
  7. Pintye J, et al. (2014). Male circumcision and herpes simplex virus type 2 infection in female partners. (citation under verification)
  8. Grund JM, et al. (2017). Association between male circumcision and women's biomedical health outcomes: a systematic review. Lancet Global Health. 5(11):e1113–e1122.
  9. Vodstrcil LA, et al. (2025). Partner treatment to reduce bacterial vaginosis recurrence: a randomised controlled trial (StepUp). New England Journal of Medicine.
Parallel workstream

Preparing the definitive dyadic RCT — in parallel with this pilot

The 24 months of the mechanistic pilot are the same 24 months during which the dyadic trial protocol, counselling curriculum, IPV-safeguarding pathway, and PPIE infrastructure must be co-designed. We are actively seeking co-investigators, Ugandan partner organisations, and co-funders for this preparation phase.

See workstreams & how to collaborate →
Get involved

Interested in this programme?

We welcome enquiries from potential collaborators, funders, and scientific reviewers. A full protocol summary is available for institutional review on request.

Trial registration pending — PACTR & ClinicalTrials.gov before first participant in